<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election tidbits</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/09/29/election-tidbits/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: greengage</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/09/29/election-tidbits/#comment-6588</link>
		<dc:creator>greengage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/09/29/election-tidbits/#comment-6588</guid>
		<description>In case my previous comment may seem a little grumpy, may I say that I much enjoyed the "Election Titbits" blog (among others).

It reminds me that one of my grandparents, in the UK 1901 census, put his occupation as "ventriloquist", which I am sure he was not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case my previous comment may seem a little grumpy, may I say that I much enjoyed the &#8220;Election Titbits&#8221; blog (among others).</p>
<p>It reminds me that one of my grandparents, in the UK 1901 census, put his occupation as &#8220;ventriloquist&#8221;, which I am sure he was not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greengage</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/09/29/election-tidbits/#comment-6587</link>
		<dc:creator>greengage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2005/09/29/election-tidbits/#comment-6587</guid>
		<description>Do we have to use the American word "tidbit" instead of the good old word "titbit"? I expect it is a case of misplaced "correctness" as the word "tit" also means a breast. Are those small birds to be renamed "tids" ?

While I am on my soapbox I would also like to oppose the word "gender" being used instead of "sex".  The concept of gender is grammatical: luckily the English language does not use it, whereas in Latin, French, German etc. everything has a gender which may not be the same as its sex!

The trouble with using what are conceived as euphemisms is that they eventually take on the same stigma as the original word.  When I was a teacher they gave a new word for the class of the lowest stream: "Vocational".  Within a week children were using the term "Voc" as a term
of abuse and contempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we have to use the American word &#8220;tidbit&#8221; instead of the good old word &#8220;titbit&#8221;? I expect it is a case of misplaced &#8220;correctness&#8221; as the word &#8220;tit&#8221; also means a breast. Are those small birds to be renamed &#8220;tids&#8221; ?</p>
<p>While I am on my soapbox I would also like to oppose the word &#8220;gender&#8221; being used instead of &#8220;sex&#8221;.  The concept of gender is grammatical: luckily the English language does not use it, whereas in Latin, French, German etc. everything has a gender which may not be the same as its sex!</p>
<p>The trouble with using what are conceived as euphemisms is that they eventually take on the same stigma as the original word.  When I was a teacher they gave a new word for the class of the lowest stream: &#8220;Vocational&#8221;.  Within a week children were using the term &#8220;Voc&#8221; as a term<br />
of abuse and contempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
