Comments on: Brash goes but will Nats change their ways?

By: eredwen

eredwen — Tue, 05 Dec 2006 04:22:18 +0000

lightcircle - Good on you!

By: lightcircle

lightcircle — Tue, 05 Dec 2006 02:15:02 +0000

Big Bruv -

I’m not saying Coleman shouldn’t press charges. I’m suggesting the reason why he hasn’t.

Eredwen, don’t you enjoy arguing with someone whose line of argument is so - well - surreal?! BB’s ‘arguments’ are like oxygen to an issue like this - keeps them burning away merrily even while the Nats desperately try and tone the whole thing down.

Although I do suspect Big Bruv may be a little blue troll … a ’smurf’, as it were, it’s still fun. At least for now.

By: eredwen

eredwen — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:47:03 +0000

Why this descent into petty point scoring arguments with various rightwingers? Some here purported to be on frogblog “to learn about the Greens” …

Frankly I have better things to do with my time.

By: big bruv

big bruv — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:18:53 +0000

Phil

I would suggest that Coleman described the woman (or more than likely the wimin) perfectly.

I cannot wait to find a Labour MP who is acting like a prat (should not be hard to find) it seems I have free license to thump them.

By: big bruv

big bruv — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:16:28 +0000

lightcircle Says:

December 5th, 2006 at 8:51 am
It *is* intriguing why there have been no charges laid by the Associate Health Spokesperson of the “Lock em up�? Party.

Problem is if Coleman prosecutes the man who thumped him it will become apparent what he did to provoke such a response.

Lightcircle

I suppose all criminals are victims are they, do you have ANY sympathy for the victims?

By: phil u

phil u — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:57:58 +0000

the reason why coleman won’t lay charges is because evidence would show he lost it..

and called the woman who squirted water at him a ‘f*cken c*nt’..

repeatedly…

that’s why no charges will be laid by dr coleman..

national health spokesperson..

(and they said irony was ‘dead’..eh..?..)

phil(whoar.co.nz)

By: lightcircle

lightcircle — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:51:16 +0000

It *is* intriguing why there have been no charges laid by the Associate Health Spokesperson of the “Lock em up” Party.

Problem is if Coleman prosecutes the man who thumped him it will become apparent what he did to provoke such a response.

By: big bruv

big bruv — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:32:06 +0000

Stuey

So you agree he should prosecute the man who assaulted him?..I am glad you agree.

By: stuey

stuey — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:15:22 +0000

yes I’m looking forward to Jonathan Coleman taking some personal responsibility

By: big bruv

big bruv — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:35:49 +0000

lightcircle

Sorry but that is utter rubbish, the only thing Coleman should be ashamed of is his PC apology.

Just because you have a dislike of big business does not mean that it is wrong or evil, that fact that you do not mention that the man who punched Coleman should have been arrested only proves you to be one eyed about this.

And please tell me why the hell the Nat’s should change their ways, look at the crap this country is in after seven years of left wing government, I cannot wait until the next election where I hope the Nat’s stay true to their core beliefs and take a bloody big Axe to everything PC and the social welfare system.

The sooner we get some personal responsibility in NZ the better.