<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate change in da House</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change Elucidated :: Climate change in da House</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20525</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Change Elucidated :: Climate change in da House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20525</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by frog Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by frog Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecomonkey</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20377</link>
		<dc:creator>ecomonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20377</guid>
		<description>UK Kiwi said: "Tackling carbon emissions would require us to become sustainable- in the manner of thirld world peasants i.e. no cars, no flights, no cattle, significantly less electricity, and so on. And if the US, Europe, China do nothing (as per current trends) then we will have impoverished ourselves in vain. Moral high ground means little if NZ economy is in poor shape."

Are you serious?!! Not only is the first sentence blatantly untrue and furthermore based on some inane fantasy, the use of the term 'third world peasants' makes me nauseous!

This may be why so many prefer to hide under the guise of 'oh, everything's okay, don't want to make life harder for myself, why bother changing my lifestyle' etc. It's easy and immature to convince oneself and others that change is too scary to even contemplate.

As for the US &#38; Europe doing nothing - that seems to be another fictional statement. Changes are happening slowly, and IMHO it's better to have slow change than none at all. NZ needs to wake up and get on the sustainable bandwagon now! There is no time to wait until the results are in from other nations and then make radical decisions!

NZ Economy means little if there is no high or low ground to speak of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK Kiwi said: &#8220;Tackling carbon emissions would require us to become sustainable- in the manner of thirld world peasants i.e. no cars, no flights, no cattle, significantly less electricity, and so on. And if the US, Europe, China do nothing (as per current trends) then we will have impoverished ourselves in vain. Moral high ground means little if NZ economy is in poor shape.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you serious?!! Not only is the first sentence blatantly untrue and furthermore based on some inane fantasy, the use of the term &#8216;third world peasants&#8217; makes me nauseous!</p>
<p>This may be why so many prefer to hide under the guise of &#8216;oh, everything&#8217;s okay, don&#8217;t want to make life harder for myself, why bother changing my lifestyle&#8217; etc. It&#8217;s easy and immature to convince oneself and others that change is too scary to even contemplate.</p>
<p>As for the US &amp; Europe doing nothing - that seems to be another fictional statement. Changes are happening slowly, and IMHO it&#8217;s better to have slow change than none at all. NZ needs to wake up and get on the sustainable bandwagon now! There is no time to wait until the results are in from other nations and then make radical decisions!</p>
<p>NZ Economy means little if there is no high or low ground to speak of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeymike</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20212</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeymike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20212</guid>
		<description>uk_kiwi

"Tackling carbon emissions would require us to become sustainable- in the manner of thirld world peasants"

Thats rubbish. &lt;em&gt;Eliminating&lt;/em&gt; carbon emissions would possibly require us to live peasants.

Half of our economy runs explicitly ineffieiently. The other half is reliant on a "technology fix" which - as we develop it - may just cement us as leaders in global agricultural IP.

If a price on carbon is placed soon I'd call that (at the very least) half of our economy that can make some pretty basic "carbon gains". 

&lt;a href="http://shoppingfix.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uk_kiwi</p>
<p>&#8220;Tackling carbon emissions would require us to become sustainable- in the manner of thirld world peasants&#8221;</p>
<p>Thats rubbish. <em>Eliminating</em> carbon emissions would possibly require us to live peasants.</p>
<p>Half of our economy runs explicitly ineffieiently. The other half is reliant on a &#8220;technology fix&#8221; which - as we develop it - may just cement us as leaders in global agricultural IP.</p>
<p>If a price on carbon is placed soon I&#8217;d call that (at the very least) half of our economy that can make some pretty basic &#8220;carbon gains&#8221;. </p>
<p><a href="http://shoppingfix.blogspot.com/" >Mike</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eredwen</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20209</link>
		<dc:creator>eredwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20209</guid>
		<description>I agree with richard ...

 "that the ideas from the Greens will have a voice and will be heard loud and clear."

Jeanette Fitzsimons is an impressive advocate whose words are reaching people that I never thought would listen (nor would acknowledge her expertise.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with richard &#8230;</p>
<p> &#8220;that the ideas from the Greens will have a voice and will be heard loud and clear.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jeanette Fitzsimons is an impressive advocate whose words are reaching people that I never thought would listen (nor would acknowledge her expertise.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20206</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20206</guid>
		<description>kind of pleased that this subject has hit the "mainstream" ,  almost fun to watch people , blue green ones even , race around with buzz words , doing the same old soundbite thing when you know that this is a "topic" for them . 

 the people whom tend to make up the greens have had such "topics" in their worlds and thinking  for ,  well , bloody ages ,
 and we may see the contrast when looking for substance , in policy and attitude .        
i think we will see ( especially now there exists a chance of implementation ) that the ideas from the greens will have a voice and will be heard loud and clear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kind of pleased that this subject has hit the &#8220;mainstream&#8221; ,  almost fun to watch people , blue green ones even , race around with buzz words , doing the same old soundbite thing when you know that this is a &#8220;topic&#8221; for them . </p>
<p> the people whom tend to make up the greens have had such &#8220;topics&#8221; in their worlds and thinking  for ,  well , bloody ages ,<br />
 and we may see the contrast when looking for substance , in policy and attitude .<br />
i think we will see ( especially now there exists a chance of implementation ) that the ideas from the greens will have a voice and will be heard loud and clear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prim</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20205</link>
		<dc:creator>Prim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20205</guid>
		<description>I wonder what Sacha Cohen (aka "Ali G", "Borat") would make of all the ironies etc in the climate change area - the politics, the about-faces, the words vs action.  Interesting to speculate on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Sacha Cohen (aka &#8220;Ali G&#8221;, &#8220;Borat&#8221;) would make of all the ironies etc in the climate change area - the politics, the about-faces, the words vs action.  Interesting to speculate on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uk_kiwi</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20197</link>
		<dc:creator>uk_kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 08:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20197</guid>
		<description>It may well be that climate change is of interest to NZers, but when the options to reduce their emissions are shown, they will be less interested- it will become just "The gummint should do something".

Tackling carbon emissions would require us to become sustainable- in the manner of thirld world peasants i.e. no cars, no flights, no cattle, significantly less electricity, and so on. And if the US, Europe, China do nothing (as per current trends) then we will have impoverished ourselves in vain. Moral high ground means little if NZ economy is in poor shape.

IMHO, better start planning those seawalls. The pain of trying to avoid climate change would be worse than climate change itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may well be that climate change is of interest to NZers, but when the options to reduce their emissions are shown, they will be less interested- it will become just &#8220;The gummint should do something&#8221;.</p>
<p>Tackling carbon emissions would require us to become sustainable- in the manner of thirld world peasants i.e. no cars, no flights, no cattle, significantly less electricity, and so on. And if the US, Europe, China do nothing (as per current trends) then we will have impoverished ourselves in vain. Moral high ground means little if NZ economy is in poor shape.</p>
<p>IMHO, better start planning those seawalls. The pain of trying to avoid climate change would be worse than climate change itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botman</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20193</link>
		<dc:creator>botman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20193</guid>
		<description>Edit: Ah, I see. The above page was moved to the archive, under 2001. Rather dated then, so not nearly as interesting as I thought. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit: Ah, I see. The above page was moved to the archive, under 2001. Rather dated then, so not nearly as interesting as I thought. <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botman</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20192</link>
		<dc:creator>botman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20192</guid>
		<description>Actually, I suppose it's a Takahē. :)

If anyone is interested, &lt;a href="http://www.bluegreens.org.nz/objectives.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; is mentioned in the source-code of the Bluegreens site but not linked to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I suppose it&#8217;s a Takahē. <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If anyone is interested, <a href="http://www.bluegreens.org.nz/objectives.htm" >this page</a> is mentioned in the source-code of the Bluegreens site but not linked to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botman</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20189</link>
		<dc:creator>botman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2006/12/05/climate-change-in-da-house/#comment-20189</guid>
		<description>Great stuff. 

It does all feel a bit empty though--all talk. 

That's a &lt;a href="http://www.bluegreens.org.nz/" rel="nofollow"&gt;mean looking Pukeko&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff. </p>
<p>It does all feel a bit empty though&#8211;all talk. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.bluegreens.org.nz/" >mean looking Pukeko</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
