<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE Free becoming part of national identity</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29329</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29329</guid>
		<description>Market forces will solve all of the world's problems. You just need to get rid of all the hidden subsidies and tarriffs and export incentives in the developed nations. And all of the corruption in the developing world. And a list as long as your other arm of various subtle trade barriers and market distortions. Um, since most of them were put there by governments perhaps we should just get rid of governments and let communities trade directly with each other they way they have done for millenia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market forces will solve all of the world&#8217;s problems. You just need to get rid of all the hidden subsidies and tarriffs and export incentives in the developed nations. And all of the corruption in the developing world. And a list as long as your other arm of various subtle trade barriers and market distortions. Um, since most of them were put there by governments perhaps we should just get rid of governments and let communities trade directly with each other they way they have done for millenia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29034</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29034</guid>
		<description>"&#62;&#62;Soon supply outstrips demand. What happens? 

"Market forces. Too much supply, not enough demand. Same risk and reward as any other business. Rationalisation will follow."

Rationalisation, in this context, is a politic way of saying "putting small farmers out of work, creating unemployment, making people dependent on agribusiness for food or starving to death if they can't find a job". This is a solution?

The Economist this week has some interesting comments on Mali - pointing to decentralised government, irrigation and roads as the key tools to deal with hunger. GE isn't even on the radar.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9440765</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&gt;&gt;Soon supply outstrips demand. What happens? </p>
<p>&#8220;Market forces. Too much supply, not enough demand. Same risk and reward as any other business. Rationalisation will follow.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rationalisation, in this context, is a politic way of saying &#8220;putting small farmers out of work, creating unemployment, making people dependent on agribusiness for food or starving to death if they can&#8217;t find a job&#8221;. This is a solution?</p>
<p>The Economist this week has some interesting comments on Mali - pointing to decentralised government, irrigation and roads as the key tools to deal with hunger. GE isn&#8217;t even on the radar.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9440765" >http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9440765</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapient</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29020</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29020</guid>
		<description>STH, i agree wityh your responce to my post, what im trying to get at though is that with more output from less input and less use of land it allows for more crops to be grown, as more are grown they become able to feed themselves and nolonger have to purchase it from elsewhere and they can still grow some cash crops, this gives them more net income which can be reinvested by buying things such as fertiliser or machinery that further increase yeild.
welfare wont solve problems but giving them a means to solve their own problems and helping them do so will help, and in the long term the world will benifit.
ill agree with PEL, it may be accheivable if done in pockets, focusing on afew small areas and then working outward.

maybe GE can do something really useful and and design a plant that taps into the african watertable and pumps the water up :P , that or we could provide wells and pumps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STH, i agree wityh your responce to my post, what im trying to get at though is that with more output from less input and less use of land it allows for more crops to be grown, as more are grown they become able to feed themselves and nolonger have to purchase it from elsewhere and they can still grow some cash crops, this gives them more net income which can be reinvested by buying things such as fertiliser or machinery that further increase yeild.<br />
welfare wont solve problems but giving them a means to solve their own problems and helping them do so will help, and in the long term the world will benifit.<br />
ill agree with PEL, it may be accheivable if done in pockets, focusing on afew small areas and then working outward.</p>
<p>maybe GE can do something really useful and and design a plant that taps into the african watertable and pumps the water up <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> , that or we could provide wells and pumps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterExitsLeft</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29013</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterExitsLeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29013</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;I know. There should be.

Of course there should be, but that question is far greater than GE, which is the topic of this thread. The "What do we do about Africa?" thread would stretch off into infinity. 

&#62;&#62;Theres probably as much chance of that happening in Europe and America as there is in Africa.

I think you could do it in pockets. 

Entrepreneurial-driven initiatives have made good progress in India. It could start with a restructure of property law - i.e. make it easier to get land title, so you can leverage against that capital for business development. Restructure business procedure - take it out of the hands of corrupt government -  so it doesn't take two years and one hundred forms to start a bakery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;I know. There should be.</p>
<p>Of course there should be, but that question is far greater than GE, which is the topic of this thread. The &#8220;What do we do about Africa?&#8221; thread would stretch off into infinity. </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Theres probably as much chance of that happening in Europe and America as there is in Africa.</p>
<p>I think you could do it in pockets. </p>
<p>Entrepreneurial-driven initiatives have made good progress in India. It could start with a restructure of property law - i.e. make it easier to get land title, so you can leverage against that capital for business development. Restructure business procedure - take it out of the hands of corrupt government -  so it doesn&#8217;t take two years and one hundred forms to start a bakery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SleepyTreehugger</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29012</link>
		<dc:creator>SleepyTreehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29012</guid>
		<description>PeterExitsLeft

"Welfare wonâ€™t solve Africaâ€™s problems."

Of course it won't. There is no quick fix solution, but throwing billions of dollars of "money" at those corrupt governments and expecting the citizens to pay it back with interest through selling commodities to countries with high tariffs leading to a global commodity glut certainly won't. At least if they had no other option, but to starve they would be able to buy from local producers rather than having to accept "charity" from Western farmers who are able to provide surplus food as aid that they're able to grow thanks to the subsidies that their governents provide. 

"Getting rid of corrupt governments and anti-business practice would go a long way to providing the structural reforms necessary."

Theres probably as much chance of that happening in Europe and America as there is in Africa.  

"Thereâ€™s no safety net now."

I know. There should be. See in my previous post.  

"I wonder what would happen if an official from Third World government dared propose to the IMF etc a policy of providing an unemployment benefit in their citizens."

For us there is and most of our unemployed shouldn't need it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeterExitsLeft</p>
<p>&#8220;Welfare wonâ€™t solve Africaâ€™s problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course it won&#8217;t. There is no quick fix solution, but throwing billions of dollars of &#8220;money&#8221; at those corrupt governments and expecting the citizens to pay it back with interest through selling commodities to countries with high tariffs leading to a global commodity glut certainly won&#8217;t. At least if they had no other option, but to starve they would be able to buy from local producers rather than having to accept &#8220;charity&#8221; from Western farmers who are able to provide surplus food as aid that they&#8217;re able to grow thanks to the subsidies that their governents provide. </p>
<p>&#8220;Getting rid of corrupt governments and anti-business practice would go a long way to providing the structural reforms necessary.&#8221;</p>
<p>Theres probably as much chance of that happening in Europe and America as there is in Africa.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Thereâ€™s no safety net now.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know. There should be. See in my previous post.  </p>
<p>&#8220;I wonder what would happen if an official from Third World government dared propose to the IMF etc a policy of providing an unemployment benefit in their citizens.&#8221;</p>
<p>For us there is and most of our unemployed shouldn&#8217;t need it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterExitsLeft</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29011</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterExitsLeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29011</guid>
		<description>BTW: tinyurl.com/yprns2

Indarestin.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: tinyurl.com/yprns2</p>
<p>Indarestin&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterExitsLeft</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29010</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterExitsLeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29010</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;Typical banal â€œfree marketâ€? apologist speak.

Welfare won't solve Africa's problems. 

Getting rid of corrupt governments and anti-business practice would go a long way to providing the structural reforms necessary. 

&#62;&#62;theres no safety net to catch the â€œunfortunatesâ€?

There's no safety net now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Typical banal â€œfree marketâ€? apologist speak.</p>
<p>Welfare won&#8217;t solve Africa&#8217;s problems. </p>
<p>Getting rid of corrupt governments and anti-business practice would go a long way to providing the structural reforms necessary. </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;theres no safety net to catch the â€œunfortunatesâ€?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no safety net now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SleepyTreehugger</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29009</link>
		<dc:creator>SleepyTreehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29009</guid>
		<description>PeterExitsLeft.

Market forces. Too much supply, not enough demand. Same risk and reward as any other business. Rationalisation will follow. 

Typical banal "free market" apologist speak. When rationalisation" happens in the Third World theres no safety net to catch the "unfortunates". I wonder what would happen if an official in Third World government dared propose to the IMF etc a policy of providing an unemployment benefit in their countries? Typical example of the West's do as I say not as I do attitude. They provide almost as much if not more "welfare" for their big business as they do for their poor. 

"Corporate welfare is a huge drain on the federal treasury. Every year $75 billion of taxpayer money is spent on programs that subsidize businesses. Meanwhile, politicians proclaim that we can't afford a tax cut." 

http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-9.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeterExitsLeft.</p>
<p>Market forces. Too much supply, not enough demand. Same risk and reward as any other business. Rationalisation will follow. </p>
<p>Typical banal &#8220;free market&#8221; apologist speak. When rationalisation&#8221; happens in the Third World theres no safety net to catch the &#8220;unfortunates&#8221;. I wonder what would happen if an official in Third World government dared propose to the IMF etc a policy of providing an unemployment benefit in their countries? Typical example of the West&#8217;s do as I say not as I do attitude. They provide almost as much if not more &#8220;welfare&#8221; for their big business as they do for their poor. </p>
<p>&#8220;Corporate welfare is a huge drain on the federal treasury. Every year $75 billion of taxpayer money is spent on programs that subsidize businesses. Meanwhile, politicians proclaim that we can&#8217;t afford a tax cut.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-9.html" >http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-9.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterExitsLeft</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29008</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterExitsLeft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29008</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;that organic food tastes a hell of a lot better than anything else on the market.

Meh. It depends. I've seen a few blind taste tests, by well known organic-promoting chefs in the UK, and they failed to tell the difference. 

I think the marketing is seductive. I think that stories can alter perception. 
I think it really depends on the type of food, time to market, and impact of handling and travel, as opposed to farming method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;that organic food tastes a hell of a lot better than anything else on the market.</p>
<p>Meh. It depends. I&#8217;ve seen a few blind taste tests, by well known organic-promoting chefs in the UK, and they failed to tell the difference. </p>
<p>I think the marketing is seductive. I think that stories can alter perception.<br />
I think it really depends on the type of food, time to market, and impact of handling and travel, as opposed to farming method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bro</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29007</link>
		<dc:creator>big bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/06/29/ge-free-becoming-part-of-national-identity/#comment-29007</guid>
		<description>PEL

I am not going to comment on GE as I could not care one way or the other but as a self confessed "foodie" I have to admit that organic food tastes a hell of a lot better than anything else on the market.

Last summer I grew some of my own tomatoes, the taste difference was amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEL</p>
<p>I am not going to comment on GE as I could not care one way or the other but as a self confessed &#8220;foodie&#8221; I have to admit that organic food tastes a hell of a lot better than anything else on the market.</p>
<p>Last summer I grew some of my own tomatoes, the taste difference was amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
