Comments on: Exxon may have mistakenly paid for denier to go to Bali http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/ hopping along the corridors of power Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:02:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: DerykKnutt http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35529 DerykKnutt Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:29:37 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35529 my sunburn really is a new form of skin!! yay evolution again..its fantastic!! my sunburn really is a new form of skin!! yay evolution again..its fantastic!!

]]> By: DerykKnutt http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35527 DerykKnutt Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:26:08 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35527 I dont know,maybe it because I've never seen it,but,probably all this talk about global warming,climate and weather change is just 'old talk' im sure our ancestors had similar torments to deal with..hey! Maybe my sunburn and skin cancer is simply evolution at its best!!! I dont know,maybe it because I’ve never seen it,but,probably all this talk about global warming,climate and weather change is just ‘old talk’ im sure our ancestors had similar torments to deal with..hey! Maybe my sunburn and skin cancer is simply evolution at its best!!!

]]> By: kiore1 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35461 kiore1 Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:53:26 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35461 BB your quantum leaps in logic intrigue me. Even if climate change is false, how does it make everyone who believes it a communist? I must say the communist party must be desperate for members if it is allowing the likes of the Pentagon and the entire capitalistic insurance industry into its fold. BB your quantum leaps in logic intrigue me. Even if climate change is false, how does it make everyone who believes it a communist? I must say the communist party must be desperate for members if it is allowing the likes of the Pentagon and the entire capitalistic insurance industry into its fold.

]]> By: XYY http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35436 XYY Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:01:26 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35436 Stuey Don't you read Michael Crichton? It's caused by environmentalists blowing up the icebergs. Probably. Stuey

Don’t you read Michael Crichton? It’s caused by environmentalists blowing up the icebergs. Probably.

]]> By: stuey http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35407 stuey Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:55:00 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35407 BB, you didn't answer me last time I asked ... if climate change is a con, how come the Arctic sea ice is nearly all melted? BB, you didn’t answer me last time I asked … if climate change is a con, how come the Arctic sea ice is nearly all melted?

]]> By: StephenR http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35387 StephenR Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:13:57 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35387 Well Exxon were very open in their support of some US think tanks and other groups in the past, so it was hardly paranoia. Again would like to know what Greenpeace's source is though. Piss take anyone? Any group is more likely to have more scientologists in it than communists these days. Well Exxon were very open in their support of some US think tanks and other groups in the past, so it was hardly paranoia. Again would like to know what Greenpeace’s source is though.

Piss take anyone? Any group is more likely to have more scientologists in it than communists these days.

]]> By: big bro http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35384 big bro Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:47:27 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35384 Frog "Denier"...it sounds like something out of a Monty Python skit. Having said that I am not against free speech (unlike the Greens) so in 2008 I will refer to all "deniers" as "realists" and all those who insist on pushing the climate change con as communists. Frog

“Denier”…it sounds like something out of a Monty Python skit.

Having said that I am not against free speech (unlike the Greens) so in 2008 I will refer to all “deniers” as “realists” and all those who insist on pushing the climate change con as communists.

]]> By: frog http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35380 frog Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:47:14 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35380 BB - We have kind of settled on 'deniers' because a) that's what they do, and b) when we have called them sceptics in the past, the sceptics association has blasted us for misusing their good name because they don't want to be associated/confused with people who deny the science. BB - We have kind of settled on ‘deniers’ because a) that’s what they do, and b) when we have called them sceptics in the past, the sceptics association has blasted us for misusing their good name because they don’t want to be associated/confused with people who deny the science.

]]> By: insider http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35373 insider Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:26:00 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35373 You guys should really get over your exxon phobia and imagining they are behind everything you don't agree with through drawing highly dubious (or should that be dubyas) or tenuous connections where there really aren;t any. by banking/having shares in Westpac does that mean I support Labour or National, who they donate to. You guys should really get over your exxon phobia and imagining they are behind everything you don’t agree with through drawing highly dubious (or should that be dubyas) or tenuous connections where there really aren;t any. by banking/having shares in Westpac does that mean I support Labour or National, who they donate to.

]]> By: XYY http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35372 XYY Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:01:31 +0000 http://blog.greens.org.nz/2007/12/18/exxon-may-have-mistakenly-paid-for-denier-to-go-to-bali/#comment-35372 StephenR Nah, George W Bush would say "You're either with us or you're with the <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html?ex=1255665600&en=890a96189e162076&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland" rel="nofollow">reality-based community</a>." StephenR

Nah, George W Bush would say “You’re either with us or you’re with the reality-based community.”

]]>