<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Key&#8217;s Investigate interview</title>
	<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/</link>
	<description>hopping along the corridors of power</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kahikatea</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44193</link>
		<dc:creator>kahikatea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44193</guid>
		<description>Kevyn Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 8:20 pm

&#62; Americans have a â€śbigger is betterâ€? fixation.

Certainly the American car market bears that out. But I'd be interested to know if it also means that they don't have the fetish for smaller and smaller cellphones that New Zealanders seem to have (though I suppose what we tend to go for is smaller in size but bigger in features).

Personally, I have a bit of a fixation about small cars. I look at a Ford Ka or a Fiat Bambina, and marvel that they managed to fit all the bits of a car into such a small space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevyn Says:<br />
May 25th, 2008 at 8:20 pm</p>
<p>&gt; Americans have a â€śbigger is betterâ€? fixation.</p>
<p>Certainly the American car market bears that out. But I&#8217;d be interested to know if it also means that they don&#8217;t have the fetish for smaller and smaller cellphones that New Zealanders seem to have (though I suppose what we tend to go for is smaller in size but bigger in features).</p>
<p>Personally, I have a bit of a fixation about small cars. I look at a Ford Ka or a Fiat Bambina, and marvel that they managed to fit all the bits of a car into such a small space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kahikatea</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44192</link>
		<dc:creator>kahikatea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44192</guid>
		<description>If you're going to compare the medal count between one country and another,  a per-capita basis is clearly more logical than a per-country basis. what's really wanky is taking personal pride in the number of medals won by an olympic team you weren't even a member of, whether on a per-capita basis or a per-country basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to compare the medal count between one country and another,  a per-capita basis is clearly more logical than a per-country basis. what&#8217;s really wanky is taking personal pride in the number of medals won by an olympic team you weren&#8217;t even a member of, whether on a per-capita basis or a per-country basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44184</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 16:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44184</guid>
		<description>I am glad you found my bit of pop psychology hilarious. That was my reaction to yours too. Well, as an experienced systems analyst I know it's not a stupid statistic. That honour belongs to the agregate medal count since that ignores the number of competitors from each country which, all else being equal, determines the medal count. Although, to be perfectly francis, what sort of person needs to get excited about Olympic medal counts anyway? 

Next thing you'll be telling me that New Zealand is about as significant as New Mexico :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you found my bit of pop psychology hilarious. That was my reaction to yours too. Well, as an experienced systems analyst I know it&#8217;s not a stupid statistic. That honour belongs to the agregate medal count since that ignores the number of competitors from each country which, all else being equal, determines the medal count. Although, to be perfectly francis, what sort of person needs to get excited about Olympic medal counts anyway? </p>
<p>Next thing you&#8217;ll be telling me that New Zealand is about as significant as New Mexico <img src='http://blog.greens.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turnip28</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44183</link>
		<dc:creator>turnip28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44183</guid>
		<description>Kevyn haha, might be time for you to get out of NZ or at least see someone you are suffering from large New Zealand syndrome.

She laughed because its s stupid statistic and your claim that it isn't only reforces my point that new zealanders see themselves as this important country on the world stage.

Oh I just showed her your post now she's laughing even louder so am i. Sorry about that cause I know you actually believe your self which is quite scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevyn haha, might be time for you to get out of NZ or at least see someone you are suffering from large New Zealand syndrome.</p>
<p>She laughed because its s stupid statistic and your claim that it isn&#8217;t only reforces my point that new zealanders see themselves as this important country on the world stage.</p>
<p>Oh I just showed her your post now she&#8217;s laughing even louder so am i. Sorry about that cause I know you actually believe your self which is quite scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turnip28</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44182</link>
		<dc:creator>turnip28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44182</guid>
		<description>Samiuela,

We aren't saying we shouldn't reduce C02 emissions what we are saying is we shouldn't get involved in these silly schemes, if you are going to reduce C02 emissions then you need to do it for real.

Also what is the green party going to do about goods made overseas and shipped into NZ. Lets imagine I as a local New Zealander create a product which has a much smaller carbon footprint. What protection do I recieve from the New Zealand government to stop the Chinese from shiping the same good into New Zealand with a super high carbon footprint. Either the New Zealand government will need to give me a subsidy or they will need to impose a tarif on the chinese product. Good luck with that samiuela the China free trade agreenment doesn't allow it

So if we can't impose a carbon tarif on imports then all that will happen is New Zealand business will not be able to compete with overseas business and they will go out of business.

You need to take the blinkers off and focus on the bigger picture so before we try and build policy to handle C02 emissions we need to revisit every free trade agreement and our involvenment in WTO. Any effort needs to come from the WTO as the WTO is the only organisation that can do anything since the only real way to handle this is to apply a carbon tarif on all goods which reflects the good's carbon footprint, only the WTO organisation can do this. I haven't even heard you talk about this elephant in the room.

Oh and btw I am going to vote green but I guess you want me to stay home not that it matters as I vote from overseas so I'll be mailing my voting papers from home anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samiuela,</p>
<p>We aren&#8217;t saying we shouldn&#8217;t reduce C02 emissions what we are saying is we shouldn&#8217;t get involved in these silly schemes, if you are going to reduce C02 emissions then you need to do it for real.</p>
<p>Also what is the green party going to do about goods made overseas and shipped into NZ. Lets imagine I as a local New Zealander create a product which has a much smaller carbon footprint. What protection do I recieve from the New Zealand government to stop the Chinese from shiping the same good into New Zealand with a super high carbon footprint. Either the New Zealand government will need to give me a subsidy or they will need to impose a tarif on the chinese product. Good luck with that samiuela the China free trade agreenment doesn&#8217;t allow it</p>
<p>So if we can&#8217;t impose a carbon tarif on imports then all that will happen is New Zealand business will not be able to compete with overseas business and they will go out of business.</p>
<p>You need to take the blinkers off and focus on the bigger picture so before we try and build policy to handle C02 emissions we need to revisit every free trade agreement and our involvenment in WTO. Any effort needs to come from the WTO as the WTO is the only organisation that can do anything since the only real way to handle this is to apply a carbon tarif on all goods which reflects the good&#8217;s carbon footprint, only the WTO organisation can do this. I haven&#8217;t even heard you talk about this elephant in the room.</p>
<p>Oh and btw I am going to vote green but I guess you want me to stay home not that it matters as I vote from overseas so I&#8217;ll be mailing my voting papers from home anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samiuela</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44179</link>
		<dc:creator>samiuela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 10:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44179</guid>
		<description>Turnip28,

You are partly correct that nations are a fundamental unit which human society operates on. However, it is incorrect to say that CO2 reduction should be focused on nations alone. Here is an example why not: China is a major CO2 emitter, yet it is also the most populous nation in the world. China's per capita emissions are much lower than New Zealand's. Why should a Chinese person have to suffer cutbacks when someone in NZ doesn't?

All the people here who say NZ is insignificant ... you are mostly correct. But using that same logic, why do you bother to vote? After all, your individual vote is insignificant, and won't determine which party forms the next government. 

So I put this challenge to all you who are arguing along the lines that NZ shouldn't do anything to reduce its CO2 emissions, because it is insignificant: this election, stay at home and don't vote, after all, your vote won't count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turnip28,</p>
<p>You are partly correct that nations are a fundamental unit which human society operates on. However, it is incorrect to say that CO2 reduction should be focused on nations alone. Here is an example why not: China is a major CO2 emitter, yet it is also the most populous nation in the world. China&#8217;s per capita emissions are much lower than New Zealand&#8217;s. Why should a Chinese person have to suffer cutbacks when someone in NZ doesn&#8217;t?</p>
<p>All the people here who say NZ is insignificant &#8230; you are mostly correct. But using that same logic, why do you bother to vote? After all, your individual vote is insignificant, and won&#8217;t determine which party forms the next government. </p>
<p>So I put this challenge to all you who are arguing along the lines that NZ shouldn&#8217;t do anything to reduce its CO2 emissions, because it is insignificant: this election, stay at home and don&#8217;t vote, after all, your vote won&#8217;t count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44175</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44175</guid>
		<description>turnip, It's hardly surprising that your American girlfriend laughed when you presented the per capita stats. That's a fairly standard nervous response when people are threatened by the possibility of being pushed out of their comfort zone. Americans have a "bigger is better" fixation. Epitomised by their "might is right" approach to diplomacy. American industry's focus on quantity before quality pretty much explains the demise their automotive and home electronics industries. Hence when you presented your girlfriend with a sophisticated understanding of reality she was lost for words and had to respond with a non-verbal ad hominem attack. In essence you experienced the American version of the tall poppy syndrome, aimed at the intellectually sucessful rather than the financially successful as it would be in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>turnip, It&#8217;s hardly surprising that your American girlfriend laughed when you presented the per capita stats. That&#8217;s a fairly standard nervous response when people are threatened by the possibility of being pushed out of their comfort zone. Americans have a &#8220;bigger is better&#8221; fixation. Epitomised by their &#8220;might is right&#8221; approach to diplomacy. American industry&#8217;s focus on quantity before quality pretty much explains the demise their automotive and home electronics industries. Hence when you presented your girlfriend with a sophisticated understanding of reality she was lost for words and had to respond with a non-verbal ad hominem attack. In essence you experienced the American version of the tall poppy syndrome, aimed at the intellectually sucessful rather than the financially successful as it would be in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterquixote</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44174</link>
		<dc:creator>peterquixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 05:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44174</guid>
		<description>fwog, 
I am naive, I told you before, be part of the next Government
NZ GOVT 2008 NAT GREEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fwog,<br />
I am naive, I told you before, be part of the next Government<br />
NZ GOVT 2008 NAT GREEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenR</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44168</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 02:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44168</guid>
		<description>SleepyTreeHugger, thanks for that reply. I will take your word on all that - would seem to bode well for the other EU countries if they can follow Sweden's lead, one would think?

Notably, Sweden has committed to shutting down all of its nuclear power plants by 2010, though there are some issues surrounding that. Only ONE minor political party wants to build new ones! 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_phase-out_in_Sweden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SleepyTreeHugger, thanks for that reply. I will take your word on all that - would seem to bode well for the other EU countries if they can follow Sweden&#8217;s lead, one would think?</p>
<p>Notably, Sweden has committed to shutting down all of its nuclear power plants by 2010, though there are some issues surrounding that. Only ONE minor political party wants to build new ones!<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_phase-out_in_Sweden" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_phase-out_in_Sweden</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McTap</title>
		<link>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44167</link>
		<dc:creator>McTap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 02:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/05/23/john-keys-investigate-interview/#comment-44167</guid>
		<description>Agreed - and I think that it could be too pricey for the Greens to take a fall for it - given that it achieves less than the energy efficiency strategy for the first Kyoto period, and will hopefully be scrapped therafter for a carbon tax.

So the Greens need to go for the lot or not support it. If Helen is serious about it she will have to concede - if she isn't, there is no money and it will fail anyway, then the Greens will have to let it die.

National is out to increase the profit margins of its cronie puppet masters in the business round table and all their sham NZ institutes. New Zealanders rate as pawns and serfs to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed - and I think that it could be too pricey for the Greens to take a fall for it - given that it achieves less than the energy efficiency strategy for the first Kyoto period, and will hopefully be scrapped therafter for a carbon tax.</p>
<p>So the Greens need to go for the lot or not support it. If Helen is serious about it she will have to concede - if she isn&#8217;t, there is no money and it will fail anyway, then the Greens will have to let it die.</p>
<p>National is out to increase the profit margins of its cronie puppet masters in the business round table and all their sham NZ institutes. New Zealanders rate as pawns and serfs to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
